Who’s actually executing the close? Both platforms now use AI. The difference is who executes the close. Consarc: A close that AI agents run autonomously. FloQast: A close that’s assisted by AI.
99%+
Matching Accuracy at Volume, runs continuously
90%
Faster Reconciliation Prep with Noa Agents
70%+
Work Automated across Customers
AI-assisted close vs. AI-led close
The distinction that matters is architectural, not feature-by-feature
Consarc
Noa AI agents run the close continuously
Noa prepares reconciliations, journals, and flux narratives continuously as data lands, before the team logs in.
The team reviews exceptions, not finished work; preparers become reviewers.
Agents execute. Agents orchestrate workflows. Agents embed into preparation itself, by default.
FloQast
AI tools assist a human-paced close
AI assists matching, journals, and variance drafting. Preparer still runs and finishes each task.
Module & User Billing: Account Rec, Transaction Matching, and Journals sold and billed separately.
Agents don’t execute the tasks, they only orchestrate workflows.
Detailed Capability Comparison
Capability
Consarc
FloQast
When close execution happens
Continuously through the month. Close is largely pre-built by month end.
AI-assisted, but paced around the close calendar.
Reconciliation & matching
Noa prepares & matches autonomously, 99%+ accuracy; team reviews exceptions.
AI-assisted matching; preparer still runs and reviews each rec.
Flux / variance narratives
Auto-drafted from sub-ledger + non-GL drivers, three-way comparison.
AI-drafted from transactions; preparer finishes the narrative.